Operating scope
Country head
Capability
All capabilities
Active handovers
0
Outcomes written back
0
Connected work · Agent system
AvailabilityOS · screen 07 of 07
Listing candidates
Four sources joined into one score, weighted heaviest on what customers actually asked for.
Issues in scope
3
3 instances across 2 places
Waiting on you
3
0 already decided in this session
Three largest
AED 5.1m–AED 16.8m
Modelled annual value, three largest only
Running without asking
0
0 armed and waiting on a threshold
Decision owner
Country head
Returns to Category and buy
Scope
Oman
27 stores · all capabilities
Listen
Unserved enquiries from AvailabilityOSOn-site search with no resultMarketplace searches with no sellerCompetitor listings we do not carry
Process
Internal evidence before externalCatchment level volumeRate of sale estimated, not assumed
Act
Candidates to category with evidenceEntry route chosen by a personMarketplace as a test route
Written backEvery outcome returns to the systems that produced the evidence.
KindOrder
Queue
3 issues · 3 waiting on youApprove
What happened
Over sixty days, 362 customers asked for it by name on calls and 2,861 site searches returned nothing, concentrated in three catchments. Two competitors carry it in those same catchments.
Why it matters
This is as much evidence as a listing decision ever gets, and it currently reaches nobody. Without it the next range review runs on the evidence already in the room, which does not include what customers asked us for by name.
Already done
The candidate is assembled with enquiry counts, catchment breakdown, competitor position and an estimated weekly rate of sale.
Worth
AED 2.9m to AED 9.4m a yearModelledCandidate lines with both enquiry and search evidence. Value is estimated first-year rate of sale times the share that clears the category threshold.Candidates reaching a buying decision
Then what
Candidate pack with evidence and estimated rateCategory and buyReports back 30 Sept
If approved
The top candidates go to category with evidence, catchment and estimated rate attached
If declined
The range review runs on the evidence already in the room, without this added to it
Choose
There are three ways in and they carry very different commitments
OmanWhat happened
The range has strong demand evidence and no trading history with us. Committing to a full listing, testing through marketplace, and running a single store trial are all available.
Why it matters
Own listing is the full commitment: best margin, slowest to reverse, and a bay lost if it fails. Marketplace proves demand in six weeks with no listing commitment and no space. A single store trial gives the cleanest read and the smallest signal.
Already done
All three routes are costed against the same demand evidence.
Worth
AED 2.2m to AED 7.4m a yearModelledEntry route changes the cost of being wrong. Value is the range risk avoided by proving demand before committing a bay.Listings reversed inside twelve months
Then what
Entry route recorded, test scopedCategory and buyReports back 16 Oct
Question
Marketplace-first testing may not be acceptable as buying policy
Motor CityWhat happened
Using marketplace to prove demand before committing a listing is a straightforward idea and may cut across how buying is expected to work with suppliers.
Why it matters
If it is acceptable it changes the cost of being wrong about a range decision, which changes how many candidates are worth trying. If it is not, the candidate list needs to be shorter and better evidenced.
Already done
The question is held rather than assumed either way, and nothing has been routed to a marketplace seller.
Exposure
Not a revenue lineA marketplace-first test changes how buying works with suppliers. Assuming it is acceptable creates a conversation nobody had.Candidates held pending buying policy
Then what
Policy answer recorded, candidates released or heldCategory and buyReports back 23 Sept

