Operating scope
Country head
Capability
All capabilities
Active handovers
0
Outcomes written back
0
Connected work · Agent system
LoyaltyOS · screen 05 of 06
High value protection
Frequency falls before spend does. Spend is a lagging alarm.
Issues in scope
3
3 instances across 2 places
Waiting on you
2
0 already decided in this session
Three largest
AED 13.2m–AED 45.9m
Modelled annual value, three largest only
Running without asking
0
0 armed and waiting on a threshold
Decision owner
Country head
Returns to Country retail lead, Customer care
Scope
Oman
27 stores · all capabilities
Listen
Top decile by frequencyVisit interval changeStore and catchment
Process
Frequency change, not spend changeStore or member causeWho should make contact
Act
Named owner per catchmentQuestion on who callsNo profiling beyond the record
Written backEvery outcome returns to the systems that produced the evidence.
KindOrder
Queue
3 issues · 2 waiting on youApprove
What happened
Visit interval has lengthened materially while basket value has risen to compensate, so total spend looks flat. Every spend-based measure in the business reads these members as healthy.
Why it matters
This is usually what leaving looks like several months before it appears in the numbers. By the time spend falls, the member has already established a routine somewhere else, and the recovery rate at that point is a fraction of what it is now.
Already done
The cohort is identified on interval rather than spend, with each member's home store attached so the list can be owned locally.
Worth
AED 8.0m to AED 28.5m a yearModelledTop decile members whose visit interval has lengthened while spend holds flat. Value is their annual spend times the recovery rate at this stage rather than after spend falls.High value visit interval
Then what
Named owner per catchment, members assignedCountry retail leadReports back 23 Sept
If approved
A named owner is assigned per catchment with their members attached
If declined
The list sits unowned, and an unowned list tends to stay unworked
Question
It is not settled whether a person or the agent should make this call
OmanWhat happened
This group may reasonably expect a human. The agent can prepare everything and place the call, or prepare everything and hand it to a store manager.
Why it matters
Getting this wrong in either direction is costly. An automated call to a top decile member can read as indifference. A store manager call that never happens because nobody had time is worse than an agent call that did.
Already done
The list, the context and the reason for each member are prepared either way. Only the channel is open.
Worth
AED 5.2m to AED 17.4m a yearModelledChannel decides whether this group is recovered or offended. Value is the difference in outcome between a prepared call and an unowned list.High value members with a named owner
Then what
Channel rule recorded, list released to the chosen ownerCustomer careReports back 21 Sept
Declined
External enrichment on these members was available and refused
Khurais RoadWhat happened
Public and third party data could have added considerable detail to each of these member records. Nothing outside the transaction history has been used.
Why it matters
A loyalty programme that knows what you bought is a loyalty programme. One that knows things you did not tell it is surveillance, and the difference is obvious to the member the first time it shows.
Already done
Every decision on this cohort is made from transaction history held under the member's own consent.
Exposure
Not a revenue lineExternal enrichment on a named individual is what turns a loyalty programme into the application customers delete.Decisions made from transaction history only
Then what
Refusal held, transaction history onlyGroupStanding, no return date
Override
Nobody. Refused at design
Cost of overriding
External enrichment on a named individual is what turns a loyalty programme into the thing customers delete

