Operating scope

Country head

Capability

All capabilities

Active handovers

Outcomes written back

Connected work · Agent system

Business vertical

Merchandising, pricing and margin

Agent on shift

Price Watcher

Accountable person

Category heads

Evidence · hourly

Cost and price master

Next step

PlacementOS

PlacementOS · screen 04 of 07

Planogram compliance

Checked daily from the feed, without a store visit.

3 issues · 2 waiting on you

Issues in scope

10 instances across 9 places

Waiting on you

0 already decided in this session

Three largest

AED 2.2m–AED 6.6m

Modelled annual value, three largest only

Running without asking

0 armed and waiting on a threshold

Decision owner

Country head

Returns to Country head, Group

Scope

Oman

27 stores · all capabilities

Listen

Camera feed against planogramPromotional cycle calendarReset dates

Process

Bay level, never person levelIs it the store or the planOne cycle or every cycle

Act

Note to the store naming the baySummary to the country headRefusal to score staff

Written backEvery outcome returns to the systems that produced the evidence.

KindOrder

Queue

3 issues across 10 places · 2 waiting on you

Approve

10 stores in Oman are running the funded end caps to last cycle's plan

Oman

What happened

The gap is specifically on supplier funded end caps, not across the planogram generally. It appears in the same stores across consecutive cycles, which points at a reset process rather than at individual stores.

Why it matters

Funded space that is not executed is a claim we cannot defend and money we have already booked. It is also the exact evidence a supplier asks for when a claim is queried, and we currently cannot produce it.

Already done

Compliance is read daily from the feed, bay by bay, with the agreement attached to each affected end cap.

Worth

AED 2.2m to AED 6.5m a yearModelledFunded space not executed is money booked against activity that did not run. Value is the funding defensible with evidence rather than settled on trust.Funded end caps executed as planned

Then what

Country summary with affected bays and agreementsCountry headReports back 23 Sept

If approved

A country level summary goes to the Oman country head with the affected bays and agreements

If declined

Notes go store by store and the country pattern is never seen

Draft

End cap 4 at Darsait is running the previous cycle's plan

Darsait

What happened

The bay is identifiable from the feed and the current plan is available. No score, no rating, no comparison to other stores.

Why it matters

A bay number and the current plan is a ten minute task. A score is not, which is why this note carries the bay and not a rating.

Already done

A note is drafted naming the bay and attaching the current plan, with nothing else in it.

Worth

AED 50k to AED 141k a yearModelledA bay number and a plan gets fixed. A compliance score does not. Value is the execution gap closed within the cycle rather than at the next reset.Time from gap detected to gap closed

Then what

Bay notes on each store listStore managerReports back 18 Sept

End cap 4, aisle 12, is running the previous cycle's planogram. The current cycle plan is attached. No score is attached to this note.

Also open at

Declined

The feed could score individual staff and does not

Ruwi

What happened

Bay compliance can be attributed to a shift, and from a shift to a person. The system stops at the bay.

Why it matters

The moment a camera system scores staff, every works council and labour authority conversation changes, in six countries. Compliance is a bay outcome, and treating it as one is both correct and the only version that survives contact with a union.

Already done

Every compliance action in this console names a bay. None names a shift or a person.

Exposure

Not a revenue lineStaff scoring from a camera feed changes what the feed legally is, and every works council conversation with it.Compliance measured at bay level only

Then what

Refusal held, bay level onlyGroupStanding, no return date

Override

Nobody. Refused at design

Cost of overriding

Staff scoring from a camera feed changes what the feed legally is, and every works council conversation with it